Re: Falsely accusing others of scamming
So there is absolutely no obligation of sellers to adequately manage client expectations? Give me a godamned break. If a seller cannot not meet simple and basic buyer (CLIENT I ADD) requirements, then you don't deserve to sell to them.
Stop trying to set an "expectations floor" by intervening in what should be a free market. If the sellers cannot adapt, then buyers pay premiums for quality sellers. If they wish not to pay premiums for quality sellers, then they buy from cheap sellers. End of story.
If sellers wish to be in business, then leave them entire responsibility to know what game they are getting into. Can't handle the heat? Then GTFO out of the kitchen. Work at Chipotle or Starbucks, they have great part-time programs. WITH BENEFITS!
Sure buyers should be held to a standard, but who protects them? All the scammer has to do it make another account on your forums, and fabricate positive reviews.
Look, this is an industry space that has a low barrier to entry. Why? cause there are no standardized and enforceable rules to hold scam sellers to standard. So unless you can adequately provide the buyers some protection, stop jumping the gun to subsidizing the sellers at the expense of buyers.
I don't think anyone here makes their entire income from Everquest, so please understand this is a part-time thing for sellers.
When buying from a seller, recognize that they're not at your service 24/7. A delivery might even take a whole freaking hour.
For this reason, I've added a new rule: falsely accusing someone of being a scammer. The penalty is a week-long suspension.
You are welcome to say someone is suspicious. You are welcome to leave negative feedback about slow or missed deliveries. You are welcome to warn others to be cautions about someone with today's reg date and 0 feedback selling $1 Krono.
But outright claiming they're a scammer with 0 evidence needs to stop.
So there is absolutely no obligation of sellers to adequately manage client expectations? Give me a godamned break. If a seller cannot not meet simple and basic buyer (CLIENT I ADD) requirements, then you don't deserve to sell to them.
Stop trying to set an "expectations floor" by intervening in what should be a free market. If the sellers cannot adapt, then buyers pay premiums for quality sellers. If they wish not to pay premiums for quality sellers, then they buy from cheap sellers. End of story.
If sellers wish to be in business, then leave them entire responsibility to know what game they are getting into. Can't handle the heat? Then GTFO out of the kitchen. Work at Chipotle or Starbucks, they have great part-time programs. WITH BENEFITS!
Sure buyers should be held to a standard, but who protects them? All the scammer has to do it make another account on your forums, and fabricate positive reviews.
Look, this is an industry space that has a low barrier to entry. Why? cause there are no standardized and enforceable rules to hold scam sellers to standard. So unless you can adequately provide the buyers some protection, stop jumping the gun to subsidizing the sellers at the expense of buyers.