I took a while to consider both sides, here is my conclusion.
Remove distractions -
The Question: Is this deceptive advertising?
Anyone can deny a sale to anyone for any reason.
I can deny Xaunde krono because I am flying to the moon later tonight. My reasoning does not have to be accurate at all whatsoever. This is protected by policy stating
that a seller may deny a sale for any reason at any time.
Why or why not the poster would sell to buyer has no baring in the argument. It has nothing to do with the original question about deceptive advertising.
What we know did occur as fact:
Title to Seller's original advertisement --> WTS KRONO 8.50 - ONLINE NOW etc.
The issue:
The first message in the conversation from Seller states: "It is more of a
'Marketing Ploy' to be honest."
View attachment 40717
This has nothing to do with why or why not the trader would sell to Xaunde, or for what reason.
The issue is the advertisement thread publicly posted was admitted to being a
"Marketing Ploy" via the original poster.
We have to decide what this means - The point you are trying to reach is getting beyond
reasonable doubt.
What we know, not open to scrutiny, discussion, or interpretation:
1. Trader admits to the advertisement being a
"Marketing Ploy"
Break it down as math:
The original question: Do we believe the trader beyond a reasonable doubt that they are willing to sell these krono at the advertised price.
Answer: In order to purchase krono at the advertised price, the advertisement must then not be a "Marketing Ploy"
Seller has admitted to the advertisement being a
Marketing Ploy in the first sentence. We have a type A and B problem. You cannot reach B, because there is no A.
Any issues after the fact is irrelevant because you cannot reach them until you get passed A.
2. We can try to take the Sellers side.
If I look over the fact that it is not typical to be required to purchase 400+ krono to achieve a price ( Which is much more unlikely than say a 3-10 or 11-20 spread ) this can't be proven or disproven as unlikely as it may be, since we do not know his circumstances. It is absolutely possible he would be willing to sell 400+ in the right situation.
The problem we run into again however, is still we cannot reach B because of A.
I see things literally, that is my take as I do not care about the emotional side of business. I do not believe that negative feedback should be left carelessly,
but I do believe here it is justified.
-Diamond Krono